Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Progressive Hate

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by redrover View Post

    In other words you are just like your president. When the optics get too uncomfortable up goes the white flag. Of course all liberals hate Trump along with everyone else in this country who has a shred of decency. After the election many people said Hillary was wrong to lump all Trump voters into the ranks of deplorables because there were many hard working Americans just looking for a better life. What could anything wrong with that? I would like to ask those voters how does caging two year -old's make your life better or provide you with a better job?
    The government has a duty to every citizen to control the borders and prevent illegal entry. It is sad when little children are dragged into this, but who drags them? Its not Donald Trump.
    Anyone who enters the US illegally with a child should face an extra charge.

    ?


    • Originally posted by Brexx View Post

      The government has a duty to every citizen to control the borders and prevent illegal entry. It is sad when little children are dragged into this, but who drags them? Its not Donald Trump.
      Anyone who enters the US illegally with a child should face an extra charge.
      I didn't know you are a native American. What tribe? At lest half of my ancestors came to the country before there were any immigration laws whatsoeaver.Back in those days there were no borders to protect.

      ?


      • Originally posted by redrover View Post

        I didn't know you are a native American. What tribe? At lest half of my ancestors came to the country before there were any immigration laws whatsoeaver.Back in those days there were no borders to protect.
        No immigration laws whatsoever? When was that? Must be a long time ago if ever. I thought you were a "progressive". Here you are wanting to go back two centuries. Guess what? We no longer need all those huddled masses.

        ?


        • Sorry liberals but unless and until you get serious about rejecting sickos like this, YOU WILL BE ASSOCIATED WITH THEM BY MOST OF AMERICA !!!

          .. Big "blue wave" coming in November ?

          Do you think so ?

          These kinds of things are all over the place ! Facebook, tweeter & everywhere else LOL

          Yes, I see a blue wave... somewhere...

          ----------------------------------------------------------------

          Peter Fonda: Put Barron Trump 'In A Cage With Pedophiles,' Whip Naked 'G***' Kirstjen Nielsen, And Other Insanity

          In the early hours of Wednesday morning, actor Peter Fonda, younger brother of Jane Fonda, said 12-year-old Barron Trump should be "put in a cage with pedophiles."

          Fonda, 78, also called White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen "g***es," which he noted is "much worse than c***." Sanders should have her children ripped from her and given "to Stephen Goebbels Miller for safe keeping." He called for the stripping and whipping of Nielsen, too. Additionally, Fonda suggested ICE agents be doxxed and anti-Trumpers find out where their children go to school and harass them.

          WE SHOULD RIP BARRON TRUMP FROM HIS MOTHERS ARMS AND PUT HIM IN A CAGE WITH PEDOPHILES AND SEE IF MOTHER WILL WILL STAND UP AGAINST THE GIANT ASSHOLE SHE IS MARRIED TO. 90 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE STREETS ON THE SAME WEEKEND IN THE COUNTRY. FUCK

          Peter Henry Fonda (@iamfonda) June 20, 2018

          The actor was reacting to the disastrous situation at the Southern border, where children are being detained when their parents cross the border illegally. Nearly all the same policies were enacted during the Obama Administration, too, though Fonda oddly did not suggest the Obama girls be put in cages with pedophiles.

          Here are the rest of his sexist, despicable, unhinged tweets that speak for themselves:

          Kristjen Nielsen is a lying gash that should be put in a cage and poked at by passersby. The gash should be pilloried in Lafayette Square naked and whipped by passersby while being filmed for posterity.

          Peter Henry Fonda (@iamfonda

          SS (Sarah Sanders) is a lying gash, too. And gash is much worse than cunt. Maybe we should take her children away and deport her to Arkansas, and giving her children to Stephen Goebbels Miller for safe keeping.

          Peter Henry Fonda (@iamfonda) June 19, 2018



          https://www.dailywire.com/news/32073...ign=benshapiro

          ?


          • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
            Sorry liberals but unless and until you get serious about rejecting sickos like this, YOU WILL BE ASSOCIATED WITH THEM BY MOST OF AMERICA !!!

            .. Big "blue wave" coming in November ?

            Do you think so ?

            These kinds of things are all over the place ! Facebook, tweeter & everywhere else LOL

            Yes, I see a blue wave... somewhere...

            ----------------------------------------------------------------

            Peter Fonda: Put Barron Trump 'In A Cage With Pedophiles,' Whip Naked 'G***' Kirstjen Nielsen, And Other Insanity

            In the early hours of Wednesday morning, actor Peter Fonda, younger brother of Jane Fonda, said 12-year-old Barron Trump should be "put in a cage with pedophiles."

            Fonda, 78, also called White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen "g***es," which he noted is "much worse than c***." Sanders should have her children ripped from her and given "to Stephen Goebbels Miller for safe keeping." He called for the stripping and whipping of Nielsen, too. Additionally, Fonda suggested ICE agents be doxxed and anti-Trumpers find out where their children go to school and harass them.

            WE SHOULD RIP BARRON TRUMP FROM HIS MOTHERS ARMS AND PUT HIM IN A CAGE WITH PEDOPHILES AND SEE IF MOTHER WILL WILL STAND UP AGAINST THE GIANT ASSHOLE SHE IS MARRIED TO. 90 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE STREETS ON THE SAME WEEKEND IN THE COUNTRY. FUCK

            Peter Henry Fonda (@iamfonda) June 20, 2018

            The actor was reacting to the disastrous situation at the Southern border, where children are being detained when their parents cross the border illegally. Nearly all the same policies were enacted during the Obama Administration, too, though Fonda oddly did not suggest the Obama girls be put in cages with pedophiles.

            Here are the rest of his sexist, despicable, unhinged tweets that speak for themselves:

            Kristjen Nielsen is a lying gash that should be put in a cage and poked at by passersby. The gash should be pilloried in Lafayette Square naked and whipped by passersby while being filmed for posterity.

            Peter Henry Fonda (@iamfonda

            SS (Sarah Sanders) is a lying gash, too. And gash is much worse than cunt. Maybe we should take her children away and deport her to Arkansas, and giving her children to Stephen Goebbels Miller for safe keeping.

            Peter Henry Fonda (@iamfonda) June 19, 2018



            https://www.dailywire.com/news/32073...ign=benshapiro
            We have to give Jane some credit for not being politically correct. I might agree with her but I'm Too politically correct to say those things.

            ?


            • Originally posted by redrover View Post

              We have to give Jane some credit for not being politically correct. I might agree with her but I'm Too politically correct to say those things.
              Yes maybe.

              She isn't though, and more people are going to hear and see her saying these things.

              ?


              • Businesses don't DARE run off gays, but . . . it's Ok to run off and refuse service to someone that works for the president.

                Liberal hate, intolerance & hypocrisy again.

                They lie. .. endlessly telling us about not hating and being tolerant.

                They turn around and are the nastiest haters and most intolerant people America has seen in a very long time !!

                ---------------------------------------------------------------

                Its amusing how the left feels about denying service. If a Jesus-loving baker of cakes politely denies a gay couple some red velvet, theyre law-breaking bigots. On the other hand, when its the left doing the kicking, everythings a-okay.

                Sarah Sanders handled this situation with class. She didnt run crying into the arms of the ACLU. She simply left and gave her greenbacks to another restaurant. If the owner wants her customers to pass a political litmus test to partake of her cuisine, shes free to do so. Though, if thats the case, I doubt shes going to stay in business for very long. So be it.

                Lefties pride themselves on being masters of tolerance and inclusion. Unless of course your stance on the Donald is anything other than pure disgust. Should you be the type who thinks the Orange One is doing a decent job as president, good luck getting a table in their restaurant.

                Sarah Sanders has slammed the manager of a Virginia restaurant who refused to serve her and seven family members on Friday night, saying: Her actions say far more about her than about me.

                The White House Press Secretary tweeted on Saturday morning that she politely left The Red Hen in Lexington after it was made clear she was not welcome because I work for POTUS.



                https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/sa...rs-restaurant/

                ?


                • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
                  Businesses don't DARE run off gays, but . . . it's Ok to run off and refuse service to someone that works for the president.

                  Liberal hate, intolerance & hypocrisy again.

                  They lie. .. endlessly telling us about not hating and being tolerant.

                  They turn around and are the nastiest haters and most intolerant people America has seen in a very long time !!

                  ---------------------------------------------------------------

                  Its amusing how the left feels about denying service. If a Jesus-loving baker of cakes politely denies a gay couple some red velvet, theyre law-breaking bigots. On the other hand, when its the left doing the kicking, everythings a-okay.

                  Sarah Sanders handled this situation with class. She didnt run crying into the arms of the ACLU. She simply left and gave her greenbacks to another restaurant. If the owner wants her customers to pass a political litmus test to partake of her cuisine, shes free to do so. Though, if thats the case, I doubt shes going to stay in business for very long. So be it.

                  Lefties pride themselves on being masters of tolerance and inclusion. Unless of course your stance on the Donald is anything other than pure disgust. Should you be the type who thinks the Orange One is doing a decent job as president, good luck getting a table in their restaurant.

                  Sarah Sanders has slammed the manager of a Virginia restaurant who refused to serve her and seven family members on Friday night, saying: Her actions say far more about her than about me.

                  The White House Press Secretary tweeted on Saturday morning that she politely left The Red Hen in Lexington after it was made clear she was not welcome because I work for POTUS.



                  https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/sa...rs-restaurant/
                  The owners were afraid that she and her group would steal silverware. It isn't much of a reach to think that someone who can stand in front of reporters every day and lie so brazenly is probably also a thief.

                  ?


                  • Originally posted by redrover View Post
                    The owners were afraid that she and her group would steal silverware.
                    I see.

                    Originally posted by redrover View Post
                    It isn't much of a reach to think that someone who can stand in front of reporters every day and lie so brazenly is probably also a thief.
                    So then why did this never happen to our master of lies president, barack hussien obama ?

                    Oh, of course. He was our first black president.

                    No one dared even look at him oddly for fear of causing nation-wide riots & 'protests.'

                    ?


                    • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                      I see.



                      So then why did this never happen to our master of lies president, barack hussien obama ?

                      Oh, of course. He was our first black president.

                      No one dared even look at him oddly for fear of causing nation-wide riots & 'protests.'
                      Yes and we know how much you detest liars LOL. No one is afraid to hold a protest on Trump's watch. Of course there is a lot more to protest against. Women's rights school shootings and of course kidnapping.

                      ?


                      • This restaurant owner says;

                        We just felt there are moments in time when people need to live their convictions. This appeared to be one.

                        So she kicks another American citizen out of her place of business, because she... doesn't like who that person works for.

                        If a person who is a Christian said the exact same statement;

                        We just felt there are moments in time when people need to live their convictions. This appeared to be one.

                        and refused service to an American citizen because of who they work for....

                        ... ask yourself how you think that would work out.

                        -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                        Restaurant Owner Defends Kicking Out Sarah Sanders, Says She Would Do It Again

                        ....

                        https://www.newsmax.com/politics/us-.../23/id/867938/

                        ?


                        • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
                          This restaurant owner says;

                          We just felt there are moments in time when people need to live their convictions. This appeared to be one.

                          So she kicks another American citizen out of her place of business, because she... doesn't like who that person works for.

                          If a person who is a Christian said the exact same statement;

                          We just felt there are moments in time when people need to live their convictions. This appeared to be one.

                          and refused service to an American citizen because of who they work for....

                          ... ask yourself how you think that would work out.

                          -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          Restaurant Owner Defends Kicking Out Sarah Sanders, Says She Would Do It Again

                          ....

                          https://www.newsmax.com/politics/us-.../23/id/867938/
                          Do you think it is unusual for people who make a living doing the bidding for a monster are treated roughly? I don't believe in Satan but I do believe in evil in my opinion Trump is pure evil.

                          ?


                          • Originally posted by redrover View Post

                            Do you think it is unusual for people who make a living doing the bidding for a monster are treated roughly? I don't believe in Satan but I do believe in evil in my opinion Trump is pure evil.
                            Great, so he's perfect ! You loved barack too, and he was evil as Hell ! ... so all is well in roverland

                            ?


                            • Originally posted by redrover View Post

                              Do you think it is unusual for people who make a living doing the bidding for a monster are treated roughly? I don't believe in Satan but I do believe in evil in my opinion Trump is pure evil.
                              So, over 24 hours and you have yet to actually respond to the opening from the Captain up there. What is it with you (and DON'T tell me you were in Viet Nam ...) You had your panties in a pinch when the baker refused to put a congratulatory message on a cake. You were supportive of all the homosexuals who boycotted the bakery.

                              This is EXACTLY the same thing and here you are hypocritically defending the restaurant owner?

                              Why don't you respond to the article instead of trying to worm your hatred into every post? JUST once, respond to what was said.

                              ?


                              • This is the sickness we're up against.

                                They are dangerous.

                                These leftists encourage violence and are wrong.

                                --------------------------------------------------------

                                Someone is going to get killed. We have gone beyond the severed presidential head help by the unfunny and untalented Kathy Griffin to mob action, including the physical harassment of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen who just days before was drummed out of a Mexican restaurant by left-wing activists protesting the separation of children from parents caught crossing the border illegally.

                                Nielsen was also targeted by a leftist mob at her home:
                                A cabal of protesters gathered outside Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsens Virginia townhouse Friday morning, blasting audio of crying immigrant children and chanting No justice, no sleep.

                                The small crowd of about two dozen protesters was led by CREDO Action, a progressive grassroots organization. Video posted to social media shows the protesters repeatedly yelling, Shame! as Nielsen leaves her home and enters a vehicle. History will remember you! shouted one protester with a British accent. You belong in the Hague! Youre a modern-day Nazi!



                                Well, we all know what happened to the Nazis. They were hunted down worldwide and executed. The lefts incitement of physical violence through rhetoric and mob action is excused or ignored by a leftist media who go into spasms of righteous indignation after every presidential tweet.

                                In the days of civil discourse, ideological opponents would target each others rhetoric, not each other. What you said was evil or inappropriate and must be denounced. Now, following Saul Alinskys playbook, it is not what conservatives stand for that is evil. Conservatives themselves are evil. They must be thrown out of restaurants, confronted at their homes and, yes, shot on baseball practice fields.

                                One wonders if it had been Peter Fonda instead of Sarah Huckabee Sanders who chose to dine at the Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia. Would restaurant co-owner Stephanie Wilkinson have asked the C-list actor, who suggested that President Trumps son deserved an unspeakable fate while suggesting Trump supporters be hunted down and harassed, or worse, to leave because the restaurant has certain standards?

                                One wonders if those standards would have applied to Peter Fonda, who apparently has a movie coming out. Certainly the Roseanne Barr standard for indignant lefties does not apply to him:

                                Roseanne Barr literally had her career destroyed by the establishment media and Hollywood a few weeks ago over one racist Tweet. Peter Fonda, however, has been given a free pass by the establishment media and Hollywoods #MeToo activists after tweeting out a call to have a child raped and a woman sexually abused and humiliated

                                Never forget that Fonda sent out a call for mob violence, a call for a child (the 11-year-old son of President Trump) to be kidnapped from his mother and thrown in a cage with pedophiles. Peter Fonda sought to orchestrate mob action that would result in the gang-rape of an innocent child

                                WE SHOULD RIP BARRON TRUMP FROM HIS MOTHERS ARMS AND PUT HIM IN A CAGE WITH PEDOPHILES, Fondas Tuesday night tweet read.

                                But Fonda wasnt done. He also called on his mob to terrorize the children of ICE agents.

                                [W]e only need to surround their schools and scare the sh*t out of them and worry the f*ck out of the agents frm CBE ICE & REGULAR BORDER PATROL AGENTS. WE NEED TO SCARE THE F*CK OUT OF THEM! NEED TO MAKE THEIR CHILDREN WORRY NOW, Fonda demanded.

                                Then Fonda turned his hate towards two women, Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, who he attacked with the sexist slur gash, and Kirstjen Nielsen, the Department of Homeland Security, who he wanted to see stripped naked and publicly whipped.

                                This incendiary rhetoric and physical confrontation is a reminder of the heated leftist rhetoric that preceded and inspired a gunman to hunt down and shoot Republican congressmen at a baseball practice field in Arlington, Virginia. Then, too, it was suggested by some that the targets of the gunman had it coming, as some say of the targets of current leftist thugs.

                                Typical was MSNBCs Joy Ann Reid, who, in an appalling example of the lefts pathological hatred of anything and anyone conservative, said, in not so many words, that Rep. Steve Scalise kind of had it coming when a Bernie Sanders volunteer tried to assassinate him and his GOP colleagues as they practiced for the annual baseball game between Democrats and Republicans in Congress. As Fox News reported:

                                As Rep. Steve Scalise lay in his hospital bed recovering after he was shot by a maniac gunman who was hunting congressional Republicans, an MSNBC host asked whether the House Majority Whips life-threatening injuries meant Americans had to ignore his political positions.

                                Joy Ann Reid on Saturday cited Scalises positions on ObamaCare and gay marriage as among the concerning moral issues she felt couldnt be overlooked despite his critical injury at the hands of a left-leaning lunatic who opened fire at a GOP baseball practice on June 14.

                                Theres a whole country out there and a lot of people, at least in my Twitter timeline, and its a delicate thing, because everybody is wishing the congressman well and hoping that he recovers, but Steve Scalise has a history that weve all been forced to sort of ignore on race, Reid said.

                                Joy Ann Reids litany of Scalises crimes against humanity for which he deserved being target for assassination reveal how skewed to left is the moral compass of those on the left:
                                'He did come to leadership after some controversy over attending a white nationalist event, which he says he didn't know what it was.

                                'He also co-sponsored a bill to amend the Constitution to define marriage as between a man and a woman. He voted for the House healthcare bill, which as you said would gut healthcare for millions of people including three million children and he cosponsored a bill to repeal the ban on semiautomatic weapons.'


                                While Joy Ann Reid can be dismissed as a left-wing gadfly on a cable network, CBS Scott Pelley supposedly represented mainstream media and its professed objectivity and fairness. But there he was, blaming Scalises shooting on Scalises own rhetoric:
                                Thursday evening, CBS's Scott Pelley, who officially ended his tenure as the network's Evening News anchor the following evening, told viewers that "It's time to ask whether the attack on the United States Congress Wednesday was foreseeable, predictable and, to some degree, self-inflicted."

                                It's clear from Pelley's subsequent commentary that his answers to all three elements are "Yes." It's equally clear from the examples he supplied as support that he sees (or wants viewers to see) the problem as predominantly about the conduct of those on the right.


                                Self-inflicted? As has been noted on this site, the Alexandria shooter woke up one morning intent on killing Republicans, not because of anything theyve said or done, but because Democratic leaders from Nancy Pelosi, to Bernie Sanders, to Jerry Brown to Maxine Waters, have said Republican policies, from healthcare to climate change, will kill people or are Nazi-inspired, keep setting off the leftist loons determined to save mankind.

                                Not surprisingly, Rep. Maxine Waters has embraced the civilized concept of mob rule:
                                On Saturday night, California Congresswoman Maxine Waters encouraged the type of recent protests against President Trump as seen in several Washington, DC and Virginia area restaurants, saying that she has "no sympathy" for those who serve in the administration and that the public should "turn on them" and "absolutely harass" White House officials while they are doing normal every day activities

                                Rep. Waters then went further, adding that members of the Trump administration who continue to serve and defend the president should be harangued at gas stations, restaurants, and while shopping at department stores. "They know what they are doing is wrong," said Rep. Waters. And for that, the public should ridicule and protest them every chance they get, according to the California congresswoman.



                                Just as in the case of Steve Scalise, those on the left are suggesting that Sarah Sanders, Kirstjen Nielsen, and even young Baron Trump, deserve the vitriol and confrontation directed at them. Their hateful end-justifies-the-means rhetoric will likely inspire someone like the loon who shot up an Alexandria baseball field to take similar action.

                                After all, if you believe in securing the border and enforcing the nations laws, you have it coming.


                                https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...e_tragedy.html

                                ?

                                Working...
                                X