Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

The Hunt

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Hunt


    The hate from part of American society against other Americans can go nowhere good

    The "walk away" movement has had no effect on the ever increasing venom from certain sectors, only seemed to have encouraged it

    How does this story end ?

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    American author Richard Connell wrote a short story in 1924 titled "A Most Dangerous Game." It is about a lifelong hunter of big game who has grown bored by the ease with which he can kill animals. He decides that only hunting man, an animal capable of reason, will excite him.

    "Instinct is no match for reason," he says. He lives on a remote island where ships often crash and the shipwrecked sailors provide his prey or he forces ships to crash by fooling them, leading them into a rocky shoal with lights that suggest safety. When an expert hunter himself, Rainsford, accidently falls off a yacht and swims to the island for safety, he is at first welcomed but he inevitably becomes the prey. The story is ghoulish, yet another about man's inhumanity to man. The host and hunter of the island, General Zaroff, believes himself superior to most other men and so has no qualms about his particular game of sport. As he explains his operation to the newly rescued guest who is justifiably horrified, Zaroff says to him, "I refuse to believe that so modern and civilized a young man as you seem to be harbors romantic ideas about the value of human life." Which has a familiar ring: Now that they officially support infanticide, we know for sure that our left does not value human life.

    Today we learned that Universal Studios in May of 2018 greenlighted a film called The Hunt. It is about "deplorables," Trump supporters, who are apparently drugged and kidnapped only to be stalked for sport by elite liberals.

    Lovely. Cookie-cutter versions of these same people, in the foulest of words, accuse President Trump of "extreme rhetoric" 24/7 on CNN and MSNBC, but, most likely, they love the idea of this film. Promote violence against conservatives? That's their game and they are proud of it. They feel as justified calling for the murder of Trump supporters as Gen. Zaroff does, hunting men for sport. This is how far off the reservation of civilized normalcy the left is today.

    When the horrific events in El Paso and Dayton occurred, many of them did not wait five minutes before blaming Trump.

    At the same time, protestors were gathering at Sen. Mitch McConnell's home, shrieking all manner of hopes for his demise. As many have rightly observed, our left is all about projection. They accuse conservatives of being guilty of everything they actually think and do.

    They encourage violence.

    They lie to sell a program like Obamacare, for example.

    It is they who are the racists, who see skin color and sexual orientation as the most important aspects of an individual but then it is not really individuals that matter, only discrete victim groups.

    We now must suffer the laments of Hollywood celebrities who are disgusted by their own whiteness and the privilege they now are convinced it provided. Rosanna Arquette feels so guilty. This nonsense is exactly what the left has been promoting for ages, identity politics above all.

    That a major film studio would set such a project in motion is all the proof anyone needs to know how far gone the Hollywood left is; they inhabit a very distinct, very impermeable bubble. Like our leftist media, they actually think people outside of their industry care what they think. We do not.

    And now they are so comfortable in their fascist, intolerant, America-hating skin that they've spent millions on a movie about hunting Republicans for sport. This should be the final nail in their coffin.

    Not to be outdone by Hollywood moonbats, many members of Congress are on the same bandwagon.

    Joaquin Castro thought it would be clever to publish the names of Trump donors in his neck of the woods. Clearly he was hoping people would show up at their homes and torment them. He even published the names of their employers, no doubt hoping they would lose their jobs.

    It is difficult to find words to describe how incredibly stupid this kind of dangerous ploy is in today's America. Rashida Tlaib's profane and vicious outbursts are as ill-considered as those of the terminally dumb Beto O'Rourke. How either of these two people ever made it into the House is a sad commentary on the intelligence of voters in their districts. The same goes, of course, for Ilhan Omar, the fraudster, liar and incestuous bigamist in the House. These three would be the first to sign up for a game to hunt conservatives for fun.

    The prescient Richard Connell understood in 1924 (as did the ancient Greeks) the abject amorality that can and often does accompany the sense of superiority we see in some, which today includes the American left, the media, and the film industry.

    That no one at Universal thought twice about pouring millions of dollars into such an obscene project is stunning. That any actors agreed to be part of it is even more depressing. Nearly all the Democrats who could find an open mic after the El Paso and Dayton disasters did so to blame the president, demonstrating how low they are prepared to go to demean and defeat the man who has accomplished so much for the country in just three years.

    They could not accept his election and they cannot abide his success in the job. They are willing to do anything to destroy him, even if their souls melt like the Wicked Witch in the process.

    Bill Maher is long gone; he is hoping for a recession to get rid of Trump without regard for the damage that would be done to millions of Americans. The Democrats are willing to see the country overrun by illegal migrants rather than allow Trump a win in his promised agenda.

    At the end of Connell's story, the guest survives the vicious game. Rainsford kills Zaroff in his bed and enjoys a good night's sleep in the general's bed. The implication is that he will succumb to playing the same game with the lives of other humans that he, too, will come to see as dispensable.

    That is what the left does today, play games with the lives of others without a shred of compunction or guilt. They care not one bit for the country we love or our Constitution.

    They see themselves as qualified and deserving to tell the rest of us how to live. Connell's General Zaroff says to his guest in the story, "The world is made up of two classes - the hunters and the huntees. Luckily you and I are the hunters." The American left sees itself as the hunters and assumes it will win this struggle against Trump. They must go down in metaphorical flames of defeat or the country will be lost.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...e_playing.html

  • #2
    It was supposedly just a "satire"

    Fact is, this is how the left feels ! This is what they want to do to their fellow Americans !!

    This movie is/was in the process of BEING RELEASED !!

    I wonder, let us suppose some red-neck conservatives decided make a movie called "The Hunt."

    In THIS version, conservatives get to go hunt & kill liberals . . . .

    I wonder how that might play in our media and culture today ??

    One version is Ok, ... would BOTH versions be Ok ???

    After the recent killings in Texas & Ohio... they might be reconsidering this movie The Hunt

    We'll see what they do

    "The Hunt" is billed as a satire that follows wealthy thrill-seekers taking a private jet to a five-star resort where they embark on a "deeply rewarding" expedition that involves hunting down and killing designated humans.

    - "Gee, that's just what our buddies in Ohio and Texas did the other day, so what's the big deal ?"

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hollywood blockbuster that satirizes killing of "deplorables" causes outrage: "Demented and evil"

    A controversial movie about privileged vacationers hunting deplorables for sport is ruffling feathers more than a month before its scheduled release and after tragic mass shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio.

    'The Hunt' is billed as a satire that follows wealthy thrill-seekers taking a private jet to a five-star resort where they embark on a 'deeply rewarding' expedition that involves hunting down and killing designated humans.

    The Hollywood Reporter reported on Tuesday that "Universal is re-evaluating its strategy for the certain-to-be-controversial satire" following the shootings after ESPN reportedly pulled a trailer for the film that had been previously cleared to air on the sports network.

    "The violent, R-rated film from producer Jason Blum's Blumhouse follows a dozen MAGA types who wake up in a clearing and realize they are being stalked for sport by elite liberals," THR's Kim Masters wrote. "It features guns blazing along with other ultra-violent killings as the elites pick off their prey."

    According to the Hollywood trade publication, characters in the film refer to the victims as "deplorables," which is what Hillary Clinton famously dubbed Trump supporters during the 2016 election. The report noted that a character asks, "Did anyone see what our ratf--ker-in-chief just did?"

    "At least The Hunt's coming up. Nothing better than going out to the Manor and slaughtering a dozen deplorables," a character responds, according to THR.

    "Out of sensitivity to the attention on the country's recent shooting tragedies, Universal Pictures and the filmmakers of 'The Hunt' have temporarily paused its marketing campaign and are reviewing materials as we move forward," a Universal Pictures spokesperson told Fox News late Wednesday.


    [ Yeah guys, we have "the hunt" going on in America already !! You don't need to further promote it !!! ]

    DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall told Fox News that the movie is "harmful to a culture that surely needs messages of unity and understanding" during the current climate.

    "It says something sad about the state of the entertainment industry that this movie ever got conceived and produced. Hollywood clearly thinks it is OK to stereotype so-called deplorables and set them up for a hunt," McCall said. "Thank heavens some sensible outlets are pulling the promotional ads."

    "The Hunt" stars Betty Gilpin and Hillary Swank, who play characters who represent 'opposite sides of the political divide,' according to Masters, who added that it was originally titled, Red State vs. Blue State.

    Political satirist Tim Young makes a living by poking fun at topical issues but thinks 'The Hunt' goes over the line.

    "Why would anyone think it's a great idea to have a movie about hunting down someone who doesn't agree with them politically? It's remarkable to me that the left blames Donald Trump's rhetoric for violence, then literally spends millions to normalize the killing of people based on politics," Young told Fox News.

    "We're told over and over again by the left, especially in Hollywood, that this country is more divided than ever and we need to come together... is this what they mean by it? Come together to murder your neighbors that you don't agree with? This film is sick and shows just how hateful the left has become," Young added.

    ESPN did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    At least two trailers for the film are online but it remains unclear if Blumhouse Productions will proceed with other planned advertisements.

    "A high-level insider says top executives want to stand by Blum, one of the studio's most prolific and successful producers, as well as filmmaker Craig Zobel, and see the project as a satire addressing an issue of great social importance. But this person says plans could change "if people think we're being exploitative rather than opinionated," Masters wrote.

    This certainly shows Hollywood for what it really is -- demented and evil.

    At a time when journalists try to blame President Trump for every act of violence in the world, wannabe Tinseltown terrorists are making sick murder fantasies about right-wingers," Media Research Center vice president Dan Gainor told Fox News.

    A trailer that was published by The Daily Mail reveals that the victims are from areas that typically vote Republican, while a hunter declares "We pay for everything, so this country belongs to us."

    "While some trailers for the film have been pulled, there's an internal debate deliberating the film's next steps," Daily Mail's Lauren Edmonds wrote. "But decisions will need to come fast, as there's a promotional blitz planned in September."

    'The Hunt' is scheduled to be released on Sept. 27.

    "The executives at Universal and those even willing to promote this or run ads for it should know better than to promote political violence," Young said.


    https://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...ie-deplorables

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #3
      The leftists Celebutards in Hollyweird, who live and work in the land of make believe somehow don't believe that this movie isn't incitement to violence?
      But that everything and everyone else with whom they politically disagree with does actually incite violence?
      Pfffff!!!!!

      Yet another exemplar in the long list of leftists hypocrisy.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #4
        Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post
        The leftists Celebutards in Hollyweird, who live and work in the land of make believe somehow don't believe that this movie isn't incitement to violence?
        But that everything and everyone else with whom they politically disagree with does actually incite violence?
        Pfffff!!!!!

        Yet another exemplar in the long list of leftists hypocrisy.
        As I asked here - https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...333#post565333

        I wonder, let us suppose some red-neck conservatives decided make a movie called "The Hunt." In THIS version, conservatives get to go hunt & kill liberals . . . . I wonder how that might play in our media and culture today ??

        One version is Ok, ... would BOTH versions be Ok ???

        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Ohh no, we would hear holy hell in the media and in Hollywood ...

        ...and it might be worth it just to get these asshat sickos to have to face themselves in the mirror !!




        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #5
          Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

          As I asked here - https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...333#post565333

          I wonder, let us suppose some red-neck conservatives decided make a movie called "The Hunt." In THIS version, conservatives get to go hunt & kill liberals . . . . I wonder how that might play in our media and culture today ??

          One version is Ok, ... would BOTH versions be Ok ???

          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          Ohh no, we would hear holy hell in the media and in Hollywood ...

          ...and it might be worth it just to get these asshat sickos to have to face themselves in the mirror !!



          Of course not. The left wouldn't have any standards at all if it weren't for their double standards.

          Besides, I don't think that there'd be conservatives that would sign up to make that movie. Only liberals with their hate filled hearts would, clearly.

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #6
            Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

            Of course not. The left wouldn't have any standards at all if it weren't for their double standards.

            Besides, I don't think that there'd be conservatives that would sign up to make that movie. Only liberals with their hate filled hearts would, clearly.
            It shows you what hate does to people

            It makes them dangerously sick in the mind and spirit

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #7
              Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

              It shows you what hate does to people

              It makes them dangerously sick in the mind and spirit
              All of which seems to have manifested itself in the left.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #8
                Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post
                All of which seems to have manifested itself in the left.
                Yes it has.

                I suspect it's with disappointment that these haters, these people who would LOVE to see a movie fulfilling their fantasies of murdering other people,...

                .... is being cancelled.


                And so they'll have to only rely on their words, which is a positive !

                They must continue calling for "deplorables" to be harassed, 'doxed' and attacked for not being members of THEIR dangerous little tribe.

                ..they can continue showing ISIS, Al Qaeda and all the other misfit, terror organizations around the world, ......
                ....that the United States has it's OWN terror branch !

                As is well documented here...

                https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...en-does-it-end

                They must be so proud of themselves !!

                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                Universal Pictures has scrapped the release of its controversial film, "The Hunt" following criticism from both Democrats and Republicans.

                The film, a satire about a world where humans hunt each other for sport, starred Hilary Swank, Betty Gilpin, Ike Barinholtz, and Emma Roberts.

                "
                While Universal Pictures had already paused the marketing campaign for 'The Hunt,' after thoughtful consideration, the studio has decided to cancel our plans to release the film," a Universal Pictures said in a statement.

                "We stand by our filmmakers and will continue to distribute films in partnership with bold and visionary creators, like those associated with this satirical social thriller, but we understand that now is not the right time to release this film."


                [ ....with bold and visionary creators,... An interesting way of stating it ]

                The movie was slated for a Sept. 27 release.

                The studio's decision came a day after President Donald Trump took aim at the film, saying it was "made to inflame and cause chaos."

                The R-rated film follows a group of elite liberals hunting "
                deplorables" for sport.

                https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/un.../10/id/928130/

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                  Yes it has.

                  I suspect it's with disappointment that these haters, these people who would LOVE to see a movie fulfilling their fantasies of murdering other people,...

                  .... is being cancelled.


                  And so they'll have to only rely on their words, which is a positive !

                  They must continue calling for "deplorables" to be harassed, 'doxed' and attacked for not being members of THEIR dangerous little tribe.

                  ..they can continue showing ISIS, Al Qaeda and all the other misfit, terror organizations around the world, ......
                  ....that the United States has it's OWN terror branch !

                  As is well documented here...

                  https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...en-does-it-end

                  They must be so proud of themselves !!

                  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  Universal Pictures has scrapped the release of its controversial film, "The Hunt" following criticism from both Democrats and Republicans.

                  The film, a satire about a world where humans hunt each other for sport, starred Hilary Swank, Betty Gilpin, Ike Barinholtz, and Emma Roberts.

                  "
                  While Universal Pictures had already paused the marketing campaign for 'The Hunt,' after thoughtful consideration, the studio has decided to cancel our plans to release the film," a Universal Pictures said in a statement.

                  "We stand by our filmmakers and will continue to distribute films in partnership with bold and visionary creators, like those associated with this satirical social thriller, but we understand that now is not the right time to release this film."


                  [ ....with bold and visionary creators,... An interesting way of stating it ]

                  The movie was slated for a Sept. 27 release.

                  The studio's decision came a day after President Donald Trump took aim at the film, saying it was "made to inflame and cause chaos."

                  The R-rated film follows a group of elite liberals hunting "
                  deplorables" for sport.

                  https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/un.../10/id/928130/
                  No need to throw gasoline on the already raging fire of inflamed political discourse, such as it is, already dividing the nation.

                  Had Universal released "The Hunt" I could easily see many making buying decisions that cause that company to suffer. You know, Get Woke, go broke.

                  מה מכילות החדשות?

                  Working...
                  X