Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Istanbul: Demonstrations brutally crushed by police

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Istanbul: Demonstrations brutally crushed by police

    It all started out about a small park in central Istanbul. Not just any park but one of the very few that crammed central Istanbul has. The ruling islamist AKP government is determined to tear it down and replace it with a pseudo historic shopping mall. The aim is two-fold. Making public property to gold and plaster the most secular city of Turkey with disneylandishOttoman Empire replicas.

    Istanbulis were pissed up and demonstrated in the park against its clearance. The protests had some limited success already by bringing the case to district court which is ready to hear it and forbid any construction work until it has done so. But that is not the end of the story. The police crushed the until then peaceful protest with outmost brutality and massive use of tear gas, pepper sprays and water cannons, deliberately targeting heads, obviously not caring about potentially lethal injuries. Tear gas was also used inside stations and people seriously beaten up for being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    At the same time Turkish media largely ignored protests numbering in the tens of thousands and started only reporting when police began to retreat again, showing enraged protesters to turn the entire blame on them. It seems there are uncertain times ahead in Turkey. Is secular Turkey finally rising up against the not so hidden islamist agenda of the AKP? Erdogan pretended to be a moderate for a quite a while but we all know where he has his roots and it seems he never actually betrayed them.

    To be continued?




  • #2
    Re: Istanbul: Demonstrations brutally crushed by police

    An interesting aspect:

    The Turkish army apparently supplied demonstrators with masks for some basic protection against tear gas. While the practical use might be limited the symbolism is quite clear.

    ?


    • #3
      Re: Istanbul: Demonstrations brutally crushed by police

      Well, these are protests that started against the construction of a shopping-mall, that is supposed to flatten a park that the local residents deem important. Shopping -malls are rather not projects that Islamists use to advance their cause, right ? Nor is the shopping mall built by order of the governement. Nor is the turkish police suspicious of supporting islamist tendencies ( much rather consists of hardcore kemalist secular republicans). One should be VERY careful to reproduce claims like that and dig a little deeper.
      It is true that PM Erdogan has an authoritarian style, and islamic/conservative leanings. But he has been voted in democratically, continues to be the most popular turkish politician and has to leave office by the end of his current term anyway (since his maximum number of terms is up under the turkish constitution). That is why he would like to run for the turkish presidency, but the problem is there is a president, even from his party already, who has already said that he wont step down as a favour, like Medvedev for Putin. And since Abdullah Gl is considered to be a much more conciliatory and pragmatic type of politician than Erdogan, and even many in principle secular Turks dont dissaprove of his handling of the presidency (it was also apparently Gl who ordered the police to withdraw from the Taksim square in downtown Istanbul), the current gossip is that enthusiasm even among members of the AKP party for installing the on occasion advise-resistant and messianic Erdogan ( Nickname :"Sultan of Ankara") as Gls successor is not remarkable. And that means there might be a much less sweaty and bloody way than that of the demonstrators to get rid of him ( if that should turn out to be a majority position) : At the ballot box, since Turkey isnt Syria.
      But the current conflict also has a backround that needs to be understood and is remarkably absent from the news coverage : Recep Tayyip Erdogan is the first turkish leader EVER from a working class backround (his dad was a poor sailor), and not from the wealthy "kemalist" secular middle and upper classes of the big cities. And the poor quarters of these cities, the "Gecekondus" (often illegally built settlements on the outskirts of the metropolitan areas) , and also the rural regions of Anatolia are where his party has its main supporters base. For the simple reason that the "secular", oh so "pro-western" bunch of politicians has never cared very much about these people and at times even openly refused them political participation. That is also why one should be very careful to claim that the turkish military would guard western style democracy. It doesnt and never has ( war against the Kurds, various military dictatorships and more or less open attempts to force governements in and out? Also Erdogan and the AKP leadership have been jailed more than once) ). Mustafa Kemal, general and founder of the modern turkish republic, was hardly a western style democrat himself after all.
      It is also true that many lower middle and working class people, especially in the rural regions, tend to be a lot more religious and conservative than the higher ups, and that this is reflected in the AKPs party program. And that turkish "republicans" view this as a threat ( usually people with higher incomes, higher education, and a secular worldview). And part of their frustration is that Erdogan and the AKP have gained power perfectly democratically and skillfully avoided to be put in the islamist corner ( The party likes to compare itself to christian democratic parties in Europe, and measures like the current restrictions on alcohol sale are justified with the swedish and norwegian example that indeed have similar restrictions, not with Islam). Not to mention that on the economic front ( regarding foreign investment and creation of jobs), they have been EXTREMELY successful. :


      Turkey's economy is thriving in a dangerous neighbourhood | Jeffrey Sachs | Business | guardian.co.uk

      Yet Turkey has made remarkable strides in the midst of regional upheavals. After a sharp downturn in 1999-2001, the economy grew by 5% a year on average from 2002 to 2012. It has remained at peace, despite regional wars. Its banks avoided the boom-bust cycle of the past decade, having learned from the banking collapse in 2000-2001. Inequality has been falling. And the government has won three consecutive general elections, each time with a greater share of the popular vote.

      There is nothing flashy about Turkey's rise, which has been based on fundamentals, rather than bubbles or resource discoveries. Indeed, Turkey lacks its neighbours' oil and gas resources, but it compensates for this with the competitiveness of its industry and services. Tourism alone attracted more than 36 million visitors in 2012, making Turkey one of the world's top destinations..........Turkey's diversified, innovative base of industry, construction, and services serves it well in a world in which market opportunities are shifting from the United States and western Europe to Africa, eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. Turkey has been deft in seizing these new opportunities, with exports increasingly headed south and east to the emerging economies, rather than west to high-income markets. This trend will continue, as Africa and Asia become robust markets for Turkey's construction firms, information technology, and green innovations.

      So, how did Turkey do it? Most important, the prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and his economics team, led by the deputy prime minister, Ali Babacan, have stuck to basics and looked to the long term. Erdoğan came to power in 2003, after years of short-term instability and banking crises. The International Monetary Fund had been called in for an emergency rescue. Step by step, the Erdoğan-Babacan strategy was to rebuild the banking sector, get the budget under control, and invest heavily and consistently where it counts: infrastructure, education, health, and technology.


      Turkey is a country undergoing tremendous societal and economical changes, and wether you consider them for the better or the worse depends where you stand in society, at the bottom or up, with the danger to fall. That is also why I would urge caution to brand this as a "people vs. Governement" unrest. The old elites of the kemalist republic felt comfortable under the semi-authoritarian (and VERY corrupt) regimes of past days ( that also we in the West found more convenient to deal with than the new self-confident brand of turkish leaders), feel shut out of the "new Turkey" that Erdogan and the AKP are busy constructing around them ( it is obviously unclear where the political journey goes) and that is why they are demonstrating. And while parts of their anger are understandable, plenty of accusations should be taken with a grain of salt. Since no small amount of the loudest AKP enemies are not exactly the kind of secular=democratic= subscribing to western values company that you and me want to be in, if you look a little closer at least. Turkeys main problem are and continue to be socio-economic inclusion/exclusion issues. Islam is linked to that, but rather remotely (a headscarf is not just a religious statement, but often also an indicator of a certain socio-economic backround/origin, and to exclude women with headscarf (and/or their husbands/family members) from certain positions also means to exclude people with a certain backround effectively. And these people are largely Erdogan/AKP voters. Clear enough ?). The issue is not that much actually between Islam and Secularists, but between "haves and havenots", "town and country", "up and down". And these tensions Turkey needs to defuse. For example through a more inclusive style of politics, that includes more dialogue and less measures imposed top-down ( like construction plans). Erdogan is a too polarizing leader for that, but probably a successor ? We in the West could also help. For example by starting to finally question dearly loved simplistic policy dogmas. Like Islam=bad, secularists= democratic=good. Turkey could be a place to begin.
      Last edited by Voland; 06-03-2013, 01:42 AM.

      ?


      • #4
        Re: Istanbul: Demonstrations brutally crushed by police

        I am not an expert but I heard that the police is under solid control of the current government. The army of course isn't. I would be weird if the AKP controlled interior ministery would not have managed to get the police under control during the last 10 years.

        Erdogan clearly who ears to me to be the kind of man who would not hesitate to bend the constitution as much as it needs to ensure his continued position at the top. No matter if its called Prime Minister or President. But you are right to doubt if he has the power to do so. After all the AKP is not quite a one man show, even if he is a very strong figure there. And if you are saying that some municipal project is not the business of the federal government I wonder why is Erdogan so involved in it? He made it pretty clear that it is him who wants to make sure that this thing is getting built. Why does he even care?

        I don't know why he cares that much, if his clan has some economic interests there or if its just because he supports that project and will not give in one inch because he could loose face by doing so after what he has said already.

        The project does have an islamist touch however. That touch comes by the fact that this shopping mall is a fake revival of some Ottoman barracks in the heart of Istanbul. You don't have to think about it too hard to see the symbolism there. Maybe Erdogan does not even have vested interests there but simply likes that symbolism.

        I support those protests and you know why? If anything, maybe it helps in preventing Erdogan from beding the constitution sufficiently to install himself as president with strong executive powers. These protests could weaken his position in favour of a more pragmatist politician like Gl. Even though I am not sure how much of a difference it makes if Gl or Erdogan is at the top. They are good friends, after all, aren't they?

        Btw, that shopping mal was just the last drop. There is a clear islamist push feelable in Turkey nowadays. Of course that push comes in small steps. But I am not all too sure that Erdogan's vision of Turkey, once he is finished with his agenda is all too moderate.

        ?


        • #5
          Re: Istanbul: Demonstrations brutally crushed by police

          The project is planned and run by the Istanbul municipality in cooperation with one or two private investors, not the federal governement. Just like it would be in western Europe. And also in most of western Europe the federal governement would become involved if clashes like this happened. It is furthermore quite a stretch to argue that using ottoman architectural elements (in a shopping mall !, not a mosque) would constitute an "islamist touch". Have you ever checked what the real Islamists are saying about the Ottomans and ottoman art ( especially their use of painted pictures, forbidden by the Koran) ? Are you claiming that a nation like Turkey shouldnt use it its centuries old cultural and architectural heritage as inspiration for modern construction ? It is true that the turkish republic has been based on the consensus to reject ottoman tradition, also in the arts and architecture. But its current revival is a little more complex than you make it look, Im afraid.
          "Real" Islamists are accusing Erdogan of being much more a neo-ottoman nationalist with some roots in Islam and sultanesque tendencies than a truly devout Muslim by the way. And they cite as backup besides his style of politics, and they are united with his secular critics in that, (interesting ?) other projects like the new Bosporus bridge under construction that Erdogan wishes to name after the 16th century sultan Yavuz Selim. While the ottoman empire and its culture was around its peak of power under Selims rule, his nickname means "the cruel", or "the brutal". He also sometimes shows up in history books as "the bloodguzzler" and was probably poisoned. Clear enough ?
          There are many reasons to oppose and dislike Erdogan. His monarchic style, his little concealed messianism (that has also made members of his own party distance themselves from him), and his tendency to take his partys electoral success as charter to lecture Turks about lifestyle issues (like kissing on the Ankara subway or buying alcohol f.e.). Under Erdogan political decisions and measures are not discussed or developed in dialogue, they are imposed (by pointing to the reliably high approval polls), and that is ONE reason for the protests. President Gl has issued a statement that is interpreted as a slap in the face for Erdogan, saying : "Democracy is about more than just elections". While it is true that Erdogan has a clear democratic mandate, and the unrest may be also fueled from sides interested in unrest, democracy also means to work with the minority and not to alienate them on purpose and to exclude them. Which is more a general style in turkish politics however than limited to the AKP.
          There are also the "wrong" reasons to dislike him however. Like Erdogans backround as a "black Turk" from a poor suburb of Istanbul, and not a member or crony of the "old families" that formed the political establishment since the days of Atatrk ("white Turks"). The "black Turks" were/are Istanbul harbour workers, sailors or poor craftsmen and outside Istanbul also small farmers and farm labourers that did dirty work ("black") and were/ are condemned to an existence at the bottom of society (like Erdogans dad). Another explanation for the "black" is that they are allegedly intermixed with african slaves imported to the Ottoman empire. Which is one more reason why the "white Turks" look down on them and also use the term as a swearword. That is one of the roots for the intense mistrust between the generals, the old secular establishment, and the AKP ( that has swept many "black Turks" to power with them). And obviously the city slum and village population are reliable Erdogan voters (he grew up among them after all, and Atatrks revolution has largely passed them by), especially after Erdogan has managed to kick off an economic boom.
          No democratic system in Turkey will be stable that discriminates parts of its people, wether the secular or the religious ( or that mixes social inclusion/exclusion and career opportunities with religious practices, social status and origin, like under the Kemalists). And precisely for that reason it would be terribly naive not to also question the motives of at least parts of the opposition. The largest opposition parties CHP and MHP are (first) left/hard left and VERY nationalistic, and (second) hard right and VERY nationalistic f.e. : And it is also time to acknowledge in the West that democracy in non-western cultures must not always bring those to power that WE like. Erdogan is NOT a dictator, he can be replaced at the ballot box. If the unrest continues there might be only one party likely to profit that one should be VERY careful to wish back on the stage : The army.

          ?


          • #6
            Re: Istanbul: Demonstrations brutally crushed by police

            One of the key misunderstandings that Westerners make when dealing with the cultures of the Near/Middle East is the claim that democracy, western values, secularism and tolerance must always coincide. Which is obviously OUR ideal, but does not match the reality in the region. Unveiled women on their way to watch western movies in the cinema or people having a beer in the sun are not likely to be seen anymore on the streets of the syrian capital Damascus if the rebels topple Baschar al-Assad. While Assad is a brutal dictator, the Baath regime has also enforced religious tolerance and protected minorities and their lifestyle, like Christians and Alawites ( as long as they supported the regime or at least kept out of politics). And while it is easy to sympathize with the turkish protesters ( that are actually a quite heterogeneous bunch of leftists, nationalists, ecologists, secular students etc. but most certainly all members of the urban middle class and elite) all polls suggest that they do NOT represent the majority in the country. Erdogan would still win elections with his hands tied. That does not mean that one has to sympathize with Erdogan or that the demonstrators were not raising completely letigimate points of criticism. Or that the police brutality wasnt outrageous. But that is the trouble with democracy. It can also lead to less openness, more rural, conservative Turks (to confuse islamic Conservatism and Islamism is another typical misunderstanding) in the corridors of power and more headscarfs on the streets --by using the ballot box. Turkey isnt one but two societies in a way and how to engage both deeply hostile camps in a constructive dialogue for the greater good of the country is now the challenge. To frame this as a righteous struggle against political Islam while ignoring the polls and the connected social issues is hardly helpful, Im afraid.........
            Last edited by Voland; 06-07-2013, 02:21 AM.

            ?

            Working...
            X