Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Obama: "he still has not learned how to govern."

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama: "he still has not learned how to govern."

    It comes as no surprise that I think Obama is the worse POS to ever have held the office of president.

    It should worry some of you that I'm not only, no longer alone in this line of thought, but have company of some of his best left leaning cheering section in the press...

    Maureen Dowd.

    How is it that the president won the argument on gun safety with the public and lost the vote in the Senate? Its because he doesnt know how to work the system. And its clear now that he doesnt want to learn, or to even hire some clever people who can tell him how to do it or do it for him.

    Its unbelievable that with 90 percent of Americans on his side, he could get only 54 votes in the Senate. It was a glaring example of his weakness in using leverage to get what he wants. No one on Capitol Hill is scared of him.
    Now we all know that 90% figure while not made up, was certainly ginned up, and as she goes through the line up of Senators, they know that 90% number didn't come from their state... but still... this is about Obama.


    President Obama thinks he can use emotion to bring pressure on Congress. But thats not how adults with power respond to things. He chooses not to get down in the weeds and pretend he values the stroking and other little things that matter to lawmakers.
    I think that this is a product of a life of affirmative action... the lesson taught that you (whoever you are) should do for me what I want, only because I'm me... no other reason required. Even Maureen Dowd knows this to be a load of crap. After 4 years you'd think that Obama would know it too... but I guess not.

    After the Newtown massacre, he and his aides hashed it out and decided he would look cold and unsympathetic if he didnt push for some new regulations. To thunderous applause at the State of the Union, the president said, The families of Newtown deserve a vote. Then, as usual, he took his foot off the gas, lost momentum and confided his pessimism to journalists.
    So here we have an admission that all this was for show: "he would look cold and unsympathetic if he didnt push" Many here, and out in the real world pointed out that the bill would not have stopped any of the mass shooting from the last dozen years. Now we know it was never meant to... it's only 'job' was to make Obama look good. Nothing more. Think those Democrats in the Senate knew this?


    The president once more delegated to the vice president. Couldnt he have come to the Hill himself to lobby with the families and Joe Biden?
    What? And missed golf? It's that laziness thing again. You know... when you have to rely on Joe Biden... you're already fucked in the ass... Or as Dowd said:

    When you go into a fight saying youre probably going to lose, youre probably going to lose.
    The White House should have created a war room full of charts with the names of pols they had to capture, like they had in The American President. Soaring speeches have their place, but this was about blocking and tackling.

    Instead of the pit-bull legislative aides in Aaron Sorkins movie, Obama has Miguel Rodriguez, an arm-twister so genteel that The Washington Posts Philip Rucker wrote recently that no one in Congress even knows who he is.
    The two favorite Democratic presidents of the last 20 years are Jeb Bartlet and Andy Shepard. That both never existed and were both the creation of the drug fueled wet dreams of Aaron Sorkin is beside the point.

    At the end even Dowd knows that Obama the Lazy is the cause...

    Obama hates selling. He thinks people should just accept the right thing to do. But as Joe Manchin, the West Virginia Democrat, noted, senators have their own tough selling job to do back home. In the end you can really believe in something, he told The Timess Jennifer Steinhauer, but you have to go sell it.
    Obama the Lazy... this should also surprise no one as that is what we saw in the first term, and definitely the campaign we got in 2012... 'just enough to get by...' not an ounce more. So again this should be no surprise to anyone with eyes on this guy.

    Aside from ruling as a king with executive orders, making a couple appointments that can actually get through the Senate, and living like a king... golf and private concerts all such, it would look as though the Obama presidency is at it's functional end. Me and Maureen Dowd seem to think so.

    Thoughts?



    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/21/op...lpit.html?_r=0

  • #2
    Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

    One of Reagan's greatest strengths was his ability to sell to the American people. People respected him because he respected the office.

    ?


    • #3
      Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

      Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
      ahoy OldmanDan,

      thar be no doubt that Mr. Reagan is right up thar with Mr. Clinton, in terms 'o thar mastery 'o the craft 'o politics.

      - MeadHallPirate
      And, in the same breath, the same sentence, we have to also admit that Obama has done horribly poorly on that front, as well as the leadership front. The facts of the matter are inescapable now, even to the Lame Stream Media, the liberal elites, and the kool aid drinkers. The low information voters won't know the difference.

      ?


      • #4
        Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

        It is almost impossible to take critique of Obama from the right side seriously. Because if he was the greatest politician, the greatest leader ever seen, the right side would not notice it, and if they did they would never admit it. It's not like they are anything but partisan, and a partisan has to have selective vision, otherwise they couldn't be partisan.

        There is no objectivity on the right, and it turns them into chicken littles. Anything that hits them on the head from a butterfly to bird droppings is the sky falling. Hatred of anyone basically blinds the hater and they will only see their own foregone conclusion. And that is just the way it is.

        ?


        • #5
          Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

          obama has no leadership ability... no people skills in the professional arena... and he doesnt care to lead...

          He is a straight up politician in the truest sense. He does not care about actually accomplishing things.. he uses issues to play politics and corner his opposition.

          Fact is this week after the bombing like every fricken event that happens this POS had to give a fucking speech when a statement would of done.... all he does is grab the spot light give a speech and go back and play golf or basketball... and his people love him for it and criticize others that call him on all of the above

          Have typed it said it and emoted this since the day the man came into office... I have never seen such fucking hypocrisy ever displayed in my entire life as i have since this man took office

          ?


          • #6
            Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

            Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
            ahoy mateys,

            *throws his hat into the fray*

            i don't wanna be left outta the fun, aye.

            Obummer be the worst POTUS in the history 'o the United States.

            despite the reality that he governed in a manner that allowed Mr. Boehner to claim he won 98% 'o his objectives in the debt ceilin' crises resolution, despite the fact that Mr. Obastard hath retained and signed into law almost all 'o the Bush tax policy, despite the victory he scored in implementin' the right's Individual Mandate in healthcare reform, despite the way he's radically slowed the growth 'o government spendin', despite the fact that he's conductin' his foreign policy in a manner that probably gives Don Rumsfeld an erection...

            ...he be the worst POTUS ever. not only in the history 'o this country, but in the history 'o history!!! he's the worst American President since even caveman times!!!!

            DOWN WITH THE OBAMA, yarrrRRRRRR!!!!!

            - MeadHallPirate
            PIRATE DECODER ENGAGED

            blah blah blah OBAMA GOD
            blah blah blah OBAMA PERFECT
            blah blah blah OBAMA BEST PRESIDENT EVER

            ?


            • #7
              Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

              Heks not the worst but he is an empty suit. What will the Obama legacy be? An expensiive and ineffective healtthcare system, and the economy didn't get much worsr! Oh yeah, that's something..

              Everyone is going to recall his political confrontations with X the leade of Y. His special relationship with the leader of nation Z will be legend...

              ?


              • #8
                Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

                Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                It is almost impossible to take critique of Obama from the right side seriously.
                I discounted my own critique of the man in the first sentence of the OP.

                Could it be that you don't know who Maureen Dowd is?

                Add that to the list of things that you don't know...

                ?


                • #9
                  Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

                  Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
                  ahoy Tsquare,

                  thoughts?

                  lol, these me thoughts;

                  1) Maureen Dowd, the shrill and most snarky voice on the NYT op-ed page (i've not read her in years. i ignore the ink that she gets in me favorite broadsheet)...
                  Damnit MHP... I can't argue with you when you're right... errrr... correct like that.



                  Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
                  ...is havin' serious buyer's remorse after she pillaged Hillary Clinton in the 2008 race and genuflected in front 'o Mr. Obama...who fer some reason she thought would reign as an actual Democrat, if not a liberal.



                  aye.

                  - MeadHallPirate
                  True enough... but not from a liberal / conservative POV, but from a leadership / effectiveness perspective. Dowd takes no issue with the policy, only his inability to get that policy passed into law.

                  And shrill or not... in this case she is correct...

                  ?


                  • #10
                    Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

                    Obama and the Left have had a rough go of it as of late, Tsquare. And you know its bad when Maureen Dowd starts to sound like Michelle Malkin.

                    Will it get better for Team Obama? I doubt it. I think theres a fare chance Obama may give new meaning to the phrase lame duck, by the time he gets to the end of his second term. But I guess time will tell.

                    My state senator, Joe Manchin, hit the nail on the head: you have to do better than believe in the idea---you have to sell it, or however it was he said it. By surrounding himself with the Newtown families, Obamas argument to sell the idea was an appeal to emotion---and a cynical one at that---given that the motive was purely political in the sense that it was intended to portray the government [Obama] as doing something as a result of the shootings.

                    The problem, the Obama/Axelrod problem, wasnt the NRA: its the fact too many people know political opportunism and a dog and pony show when they see it. And that was clearly evident in the fact they couldnt even get it through the Democrat controlled Senate.

                    Obama only compounded things by getting pissy about it.

                    ?


                    • #11
                      Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

                      Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
                      ahoy JDJarvis,

                      Mr. Obama's legacy?

                      1) his implementin' healthcare reform that revolves around the Individual Mandate, a creation 'o the GOP.

                      2) the slow but steady relaxin' 'o gun control laws.

                      3) retainin' almost all 'o the Bush era tax policies.

                      4) AWOL on civil rights.

                      5) AWOL on the environment.

                      6) AWOL on habeas corpus.

                      7) oversaw robust protection and acceleration 'o the wealth 'o the 1% whilst America was in the swoon 'o a recession.

                      8) whether its disbursin' monies to Africa fer our covert and not-so-covert military operations, to his "sovereign nation my ass" approach to Pakistan when he ordered the capture and killin' 'o Osama Bin Laden, to the continued growth in military spendin'...a foreign policy that would make a neo-con hard with excitement (if only thar was a bit more nation buildin' involved).

                      i think that covers it, aye me hearty?

                      - MeadHallPirate
                      Being as how we got most of those expectations from his promises to us, I figure those are all the earmarks of am imperial presidency, don't you think, Cap'n.

                      His majesty says anything but does nothing about it when he has the power to do something. He also ignores the will of the people (and/or our allys) in shoving his own, unvetted agenda down our throats.

                      King Barack I

                      ?


                      • #12
                        Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

                        Originally posted by Good1 View Post
                        He also ignores the will of the people (and/or our allys) in shoving his own, unvetted agenda down our throats.
                        What are you referring to when you say he "ignores the will of the people?"

                        ?


                        • #13
                          Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

                          Originally posted by AdamKadmon View Post
                          What are you referring to when you say he "ignores the will of the people?"
                          Take your pick: Gun control, Obamacare, cutting the deficit in half ... I'm sure there are more, but that should get you started.

                          ?


                          • #14
                            Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

                            Originally posted by Good1 View Post
                            Take your pick: Gun control, Obamacare, cutting the deficit in half ... I'm sure there are more, but that should get you started.
                            Obama campaigned in 2008 repeatedly promising universal-ish health care and they elected him. In 2012, Obama repeatedly said he would keep Obamacare and Romney said he would repeal it... and they re-elected Obama. So it is truly strange to say that was forced down the country's throat.

                            Likewise, many of the gun control measures that Obama supported poll incredibly high... but a minority of Senators chose to prevent their passage. A good case could be made that it was the Republicans who shoved their agenda down America's throat.

                            ?


                            • #15
                              Re: Obama: &quot;he still has not learned how to govern.&quot;

                              Originally posted by AdamKadmon View Post
                              Obama campaigned in 2008 repeatedly promising universal-ish health care and they elected him. In 2012, Obama repeatedly said he would keep Obamacare and Romney said he would repeal it... and they re-elected Obama. So it is truly strange to say that was forced down the country's throat.
                              Feel free to believe that was the only issue on which either of those presidential elections ran. I believe that is so much baloney. The public, which includes the voting and the non-voting public in the United States, swamped their legislators with "turn down health care legislation" running 2 - 1 over the "yes please" sentiments. The public opinion polls ran 75+% against that version of healthcare (though the reverse was true about favoring some kind of healthcare reform). I'm not one much for PO polls, but 75% is a compelling stat, regardless of whether or not you discount a lot of them.

                              Likewise, many of the gun control measures that Obama supported poll incredibly high... but a minority of Senators chose to prevent their passage. A good case could be made that it was the Republicans who shoved their agenda down America's throat.
                              "Many?" I'm talking about the measure that was defeated in Congress: That one wasn't all that popular with the citizens. Dianne Feinstein's specific list and the smaller magazines were also not that popular... so what does Obama do? He claims he will address the issue with Executive Orders... JUST LIKE an imperial president would do: Get the pulse of the public and, if you don't like it, just go around it.

                              DO you want to talk about the "interim appointments" he staged WHILE Congress was still in session? Do you want to talk about his promise to rid the white house of all lobbyists, or his promise to make his the most transparent administration ever? Or his promise to reach across the aisle.

                              Hate on the republicans all you want, but Obama (and not the republicans) made those promises and, then, bailed on them ... and WITHOUT any assistance from the GOP.

                              ?

                              Working...
                              X