Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

    What does the government know about you and what will they do with what they know?

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

      The IRS was so busy hazing the Tea Party that they had no time to do their job. Incompetence on a grand scale. And these are the people in charge of Obamacare.

      Worldwide identity thieves steal millions in tax refunds

      WASHINGTON -- The Internal Revenue Service sent 655 tax refunds to a single address in Kaunas, Lithuania -- failing to recognize that the refunds were likely part of an identity theft scheme. Another 343 tax refunds went to a single address in Shanghai, China.

      Thousands more potentially fraudulent refunds -- totaling millions of dollars -- went to places in Bulgaria, Ireland and Canada in 2011.

      In all, a report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration today found 1.5 million potentially fraudulent tax returns that went undetected by the IRS, costing taxpayers $3.6 billion.
      Worldwide identity thieves steal millions in tax refunds

      How much was the sequester?

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

        Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
        The IRS was so busy hazing the Tea Party that they had no time to do their job. Incompetence on a grand scale. And these are the people in charge of Obamacare.

        Worldwide identity thieves steal millions in tax refunds



        Worldwide identity thieves steal millions in tax refunds

        How much was the sequester?
        Our country is being run by a bunch of incompetent clowns, and almost 1/2 the country thinks they are doing a good job, and we are headed in the right direction. I keep telling ya' circling the drain.

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

          Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post
          Our country is being run by a bunch of incompetent clowns, and almost 1/2 the country thinks they are doing a good job, and we are headed in the right direction. I keep telling ya' circling the drain.
          That half of the country gets their news from the Comedy channel if they get any at all. Most are too busy with The Voice or Dancing with the stars to pay attention to what is going on around them.

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

            Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
            That half of the country gets their news from the Comedy channel if they get any at all. Most are too busy with The Voice or Dancing with the stars to pay attention to what is going on around them.
            There may be bliss in ignorance, but I wouldn't trade the veil being lifted from my eyes, regardless of how ugly the view.

            USPOL has been the enabler in this catharsis, and for that, I have only my forum mates, mods and administrators to thank.

            Oh GOD! What have I done? What was I thinking??

            (Just kidding) It's better to be aware, really.

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

              Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
              That half of the country gets their news from the Comedy channel if they get any at all. Most are too busy with The Voice or Dancing with the stars to pay attention to what is going on around them.
              Once again, the ratings of the Comedy Channel do not bear out your hyperbole, but I know tons of Republicans AND Democrats (well, actually I don't know that many Democrats) who watch Dancing With the Stars and the ratings do bear that out.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                More of the Obama administration and his Department of Injustice at work.

                officers stormed her home in Shady Side, Md., guns drawn. Her private notes — sacred to any reporter — with information about confidential sources and her thoughts and constructs of her investigations into failures at the Federal Air Marshal Service were confiscated by a Department of Homeland Security employee who accompanied police.



                I want you loyal defenders of Obama to stick up for this.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                  I dunno. This just seems like such a political payback that the tax payers are paying for. Not sure if its an abuse of government, but didn't find an Obama corruption thread for it, although as freely as he is with the tax payers money, I'm surprised that there isn't one.

                  Obama Nominates Soap Opera Producer as Ambassador to Hungary
                  Emily Hulsey, On November 7, 2013

                  In what I’m sure came only after careful consideration, President Obama has nominated soap opera producer Colleen Bradley Bell as the U.S. Ambassador to Hungary.

                  Besides what must be glowing credentials, Bell is a fervent Obama supporter and, according to the New York Times, raised over $2.1 million for his campaigns. In February 2012, she and her husband, who is executive producer and head writer for “The Bold and the Beautiful,” hosted the president at a fundraising event in their home.

                  Of course, Bell is only the latest of the many Obama fundraisers to be rewarded with an ambassadorship. Others, all of whom are from Los Angeles, include:
                  • John Emerson, former president of Capital Group Private Client Services, Germany
                  • Noah Mamet, political consultant, Argentina
                  • James Costos, former HBO executive, Spain

                  There has been no word yet on where BFFs Beyonce and Jay Z will be sent. My guess is somewhere like this.
                  Obama Nominates Soap Opera Producer as Ambassador to Hungary | Independent Journal Review

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                    Immediate retribution for disagreeing with the administration.
                    William P. White was one of several insurance commissioners across the nation to reject the President's move to allow insurance companies to continue selling policies to consumers who wanted to keep them. He released a statement hours after the president's fix was announced. After his comments, White was quickly replaced by an acting commissioner Sunday, a District of Columbia spokesman said.

                    "The action today undercuts the purpose of the exchanges, including the District's DC Health Link, by creating exceptions that make it more difficult for them to operate," White's statement said, as reported by The Washington Post and other news outlets Saturday.


                    But White was not replaced because of the statement dismissing the President's policy, but because of "how he went about it," a district official familiar with the situation told CNN.
                    Insurance commissioner out after criticizing Obamacare fix – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs

                    Similar immediate accountability for the administration itself? Umm, not so much.

                    Lousy excuse 'it was the how and not the what'. Believable? Not hardly. not from this administration and their track record.

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                      More abuses:

                      Homes raided, subpoenas issued targeting conservative groups and allies of Scott Walker


                      Homes raided, subpoenas issued targeting conservative groups and allies of Scott Walker | Capitol City Project

                      Democrats have no low that they will not stoop below to persecute their opponents.

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                        NLRB Decides to Prosecute Nationwide Violations at Walmart, AFL-CIO Commits to Backing Workers


                        NLRB Decides to Prosecute Nationwide Violations at Walmart, AFL-CIO Commits to Backing Workers

                        More abuse by government. If I were the CEO of Walmart, I would shut the stores down until the DOJ backed off and Holder was gone.

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                          Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
                          More abuses:

                          Homes raided, subpoenas issued targeting conservative groups and allies of Scott Walker


                          Homes raided, subpoenas issued targeting conservative groups and allies of Scott Walker | Capitol City Project

                          Democrats have no low that they will not stoop below to persecute their opponents.
                          This seems like a pretty straight forward abuse of government power. If you can't beat them in the marketplace of ideas, I guess you have to resort to these kinds of tactics. It makes those people who do this sort of thing morally and ethically bankrupt.

                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                            Cancer Patient Who Spoke Out Against O-Care – Gets Audited by IRS (Video)

                            The Gateway Pundit | Where Hope Finally Made a Comeback

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                              Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
                              Cancer Patient Who Spoke Out Against O-Care – Gets Audited by IRS (Video)

                              The Gateway Pundit | Where Hope Finally Made a Comeback
                              As if the poor guy didn't already have enough to deal with going through cancer treatments, the IRS has to pile on like this?

                              I can only see where ObamaCare coverage, short on money and realizing that cancer treatments are expensive, put the guy into healthcare limbo for long enough, die of cancer so ObamaCare doesn't have to pay out. I suppose you can call me paranoid about that, but I can see it coming, and coming more often than not.

                              מה מכילות החדשות?


                              • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                                Turley: Obama's "Become The Very Danger The Constitution Was Designed To Avoid"

                                REP. BOB GOODLATTE (R-VA): Professor Turley, the constitution, the system of separated powers is not simply about stopping one branch of government from usurping another. It's about protecting the liberty of Americans from the dangers of concentrated government power. How does the president's unilateral modification of act of Congress affect both the balance of power between the political branches and the liberty interests of the American people?

                                JONATHAN TURLEY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The danger is quite severe. The problem with what the president is doing is that he's not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He's becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power in every single branch.

                                This Newtonian orbit that the three branches exist in is a delicate one but it is designed to prevent this type of concentration. There is two trends going on which should be of equal concern to all members of Congress. One is that we have had the radical expansion of presidential powers under both President Bush and President Obama. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked authority. And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth branch. We have agencies that are quite large that issue regulations. The Supreme Court said recently that agencies could actually define their own or interpret their own jurisdiction.
                                Turley: Obama's "Become The Very Danger The Constitution Was Designed To Avoid" | Video | RealClearPolitics

                                So who is this Professor Turley?
                                Jonathan Turley (born May 6, 1961) is an American lawyer, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism. He is currently a professor of law at The George Washington University Law School.
                                . . . .
                                Professor Turley is widely regarded as a champion of the rule of law, and his stated positions in many cases and his self-proclaimed "socially liberal agenda".[8] have led liberal and progressive thinkers to also consider him a champion for their causes, especially on issues such as separation of church and state, environmental law,[10][16] civil rights,[7][17] and the illegality of torture.[18][19][20][21] Politico has referred to Turley as a "liberal law professor and longtime civil libertarian".[22] Turley has nevertheless exhibited his disagreement with rigid ideological stances in contradiction to the established law with other stated and published opinions.[10][22][23]
                                In numerous appearances on Countdown with Keith Olbermann and The Rachel Maddow Show, he has called for criminal prosecution of Bush administration officials for war crimes, including torture.[24]
                                Jonathan Turley - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                                So a self-proclaimed social liberal, a liberal and a progressive, warns that Obama and his imperial attitude to his presidency are a 'severe danger'. And that "The problem with what the president is doing is that he's not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He's becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power in every single branch."

                                So. Obama is now raising the ire of his own? Obama and his actions in the presidential role are now beyond the constitution's dictates?

                                Oh I forgot. I'm a racist. Shame on me. (sarcasm)

                                מה מכילות החדשות?

                                Working...
                                X