Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

    Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
    For those who believe you should fight the Federal Government when they are wrong and believe you can win:



    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/brit...glish-language
    You know, stories like this reminds me of Alice in Wonderland. The first question that my own brain asked, is why were these people hired in the first place? Did the employer get funds from taxpayers for doing this? And if not, why in the world would anyone hire someone for an American business that couldn't speak English well enough to communicate?

    My own view of course is that speaking English is just another job requirement, as knowing how to do a particular task is.

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

      “Operation Choke Point is one of the most dangerous programs I have experienced in my 45 years of service as a bank regulator, bank attorney and consultant, and bank board member. Operating without legal authority and guided by a political agenda, unelected officials at the DOJ are discouraging banks from providing basic banking services…to lawful businesses simply because they don’t like them,” said William M. Isaac, former chairman of the FDIC.
      Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/18/op...#ixzz37pLUyrr9

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

        Was reading through this thread and lost interest when that classy gentleman found the best way to express his feelings about anyone who disagree's with him by calling the rest of you all fxxxing morons. Will catch you all on another thread.

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

          When libs start losing an argument, they can get pretty hateful.

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

            More government abuse of power and government over reach by this president and this administration.

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

              More government abuse of power and government over reach by this president and this administration.<br>
              <br>
              The Environmental Protection Agency has quietly floated a rule claiming authority to bypass the courts and unilaterally garnish paychecks of those accused of violating its rules, a power currently used by agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service.<br>The EPA has been flexing its regulatory muscle under President Obama, collecting more fines each year and threatening individuals with costly penalties for violating environmental rules. In one case, the agency has threatened fines of up to $75,000 per day on Wyoming homeowner Andy Johnson for building a pond on his rural property.<br>“The EPA has a history of overreaching its authority. It seems like once again the EPA is trying to take power it doesn’t have away from American citizens,” Sen. John Barrasso, Wyoming Republican, said when he learned of the EPA’s wage garnishment scheme.<br>Others questioned why the EPA decided to strengthen its collection muscle at this time.<br>Critics said the threat of garnishing wages would be a powerful incentive for people to agree to expensive settlements rather than fight EPA charges.<br>
              <br>
              <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/8/power-grab-epa-wants-to-garnish-wages-of-polluters" target="_blank">Power grab: EPA wants to garnish wages of polluters</a><br>
              Accused violators of pollution laws would have little recourse<br>
              <br>
              EPA would be authorized to unilaterally garnish wages with seemingly little due process. Harrumph. That's not my understanding of this Republic is supposed to work.<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              <br>

              ---------DOUBLE POST-----------

              Weird.&nbsp; I can post plain text, but anything with a link or a quote gets a 'permission denied'.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                Operation Choke Point, a misguided Obama DOJ operation that's hurting legitimate businesses they don't like.

                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Choke_Point

                And it's Republicans that are calling they to task on it.

                http://www.washingtonpost.com/busine...d23_story.html

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                  Documents: Federal Prosecutors Misled Judge in Pursuit of Prison Time For Dinesh D'Souza

                  Documents: Federal Prosecutors Misled Judge in Pursuit of Prison Time For Dinesh D&#39;Souza - Katie Pavlich

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                    Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
                    Documents: Federal Prosecutors Misled Judge in Pursuit of Prison Time For Dinesh D'Souza

                    Documents: Federal Prosecutors Misled Judge in Pursuit of Prison Time For Dinesh D&#39;Souza - Katie Pavlich
                    Yeah, there's a real difference between being a friend of Obama's like GE CEO Immelt, who not only is appointed to a useless and unproductive jobs council, as well as not any corporate income tax. You criticize this president or his administration, and you are taking on all departments of the government, like DOJ and IRS.

                    And everyone was complaining about Bush having an 'imperial' presidency? Ha! He couldn't hold a candle to Obama.

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                      Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post
                      Yeah, there's a real difference between being a friend of Obama's like GE CEO Immelt, who not only is appointed to a useless and unproductive jobs council, as well as not any corporate income tax. You criticize this president or his administration, and you are taking on all departments of the government, like DOJ and IRS.

                      And everyone was complaining about Bush having an 'imperial' presidency? Ha! He couldn't hold a candle to Obama.
                      Isn't it rather apparent that those men who would be president are sociopaths? Intoxicated by power? That they are above the law? No different from the politicians of the roman empire, and we see what happened to that empire, all of the empires of history. All are doomed to fail, including our own.

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                        Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                        Isn't it rather apparent that those men who would be president are sociopaths? Intoxicated by power? That they are above the law? No different from the politicians of the roman empire, and we see what happened to that empire, all of the empires of history. All are doomed to fail, including our own.
                        Your beloved FDR was one of the first and one of the worst.

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                          Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
                          Your beloved FDR was one of the first and one of the worst.
                          Ah, you are just wanting to pick a verbal fight! LOL.

                          I like what FDR stood for, much of it. But not all. I understand why conservatives dislike him though, for their ideological beliefs find little home in FDR. But FDR was against public unions, he was anti monopoly, he thought the rich to be too damned entitled in their attitudes, and he was right IMO. He also knew all too well of the power that these would be oligarchs had, and he took them to task. Which is rather rare, to take the elites to task. I applaud him, while the conservative doesn't.

                          I feel that his idea of social security for the old people, who cannot work to earn their keep came from the Christian God. That God spoke to his heart and other hearts of that era. That conservatives couldn't have a heart to be spoken to, continues to this very day.

                          God gave the earths resources so that his greatest creation, humanity, might thrive, as other life thrives on this planet. It is the natural order, that life thrive. Only greed in man has kept humanity from thriving. And if someone like FDR moves towards the wishes of God, he is disliked, hated, by those that think they are special and deserve to be very rich as millions starve. It is God's Will that all of his children thrive, and if greed gets in the way, it is only man that can counteract that greed, by doing away with the system that allows it, that runs on it.

                          I am not saying God is liberal, for liberals believe in killing the unborn for simple convenience. But He is clearly not conservative either. A man of God, if he were to form a society, there would be no place for the rich, and the goal would be that all in that society might thrive, by work, not by laziness. Anything that moves us towards that, whether it be in the vein of FDR or not, is doing God's Will. I feel this to be a fact. For logic leads there.

                          God doesn't trickle down from the rich to care for his other children. But he has left it up to us, to come up with the system that allows His Will to manifest. It really is up to humanity to do this, for God doesn't interfere with us, and lets us go our own way. But there is a righteous way that He desires, and it has nothing to do with most of conservative ideology, nor liberal for that matter.

                          See oldman, I am driven only by morality, doing the right thing for humanity, not by liberalism nor conservatism, although one can create an image that I am one or the other, or neither. I am not interested in ideologies, but only that humanity may finally, thrive, as a species, as other lifeforms do. Only the human ego has made it impossible to achieve, for we are fragmented into these separate egos, which are driven by nefarious things, a hyper, sociopathic deep selfish self interest that harms others in every way imaginable. This is what only intelligence can move us away from, and that intelligence can only come from the Intelligence. The Intelligence that created this marvelous universe.

                          That I feel that FDR was closer to this intelligence than any conservative ever could be is not to say that FDR was in anyway close to perfection in vision. But some of the ideas he had were grounded firmly in this thing we call morality. Others were not. The changes that have happened to our society is not due to FDR, but other men who used no intelligence in constructing the corrupt welfare state. They moved far beyond what FDR envisioned, into insanity.

                          What has the conservative ideology given us since its return in 1981? It has not helped average people in America, quite the contrary. But WHO would have expected an elitist ideology, embraced by confused average americans, to benefit the People? It is nothing more than a ruse to give more power to the elites, who that party represented, until average americans were fooled into believing otherwise. I think this is an objective view.

                          I am not saying the modern liberal mentality is better than conservatism. I am saying an older liberalism was a common sense liberalism, with morality important in what it wanted to achieve. That they had noble, moral goals, which it didn't take long to lose. For basically that old liberalism wanted all people who must work to live, to thrive by their work, and not used only to make a few extraordinary wealthy. God seemingly has a very dim view of the people the conservatives find so valuable.

                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                            FDR put innocent Americans in motherfucking concentration camps! Nothing else the motherfucker did matters. Not. One. Fucking. Thing.

                            If you feel FDR was divinely inspired, please tell me where the FUCK God said to put anyone in concentration camps.

                            You admire FDR for being against the rich while "millions starve", but you ignore the fact that innocent people starved and died in his concentration camps.

                            Fuck that evil motherfucker. Nothing Godly or divinely inspired - he was an agent of pure evil.

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                              Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
                              Your beloved FDR was one of the first and one of the worst.
                              The only American president to put people in concentration camps. The absolute worst president EVER, by far. A stone piece of shit, who should have been tried, convicted, and hung on the White House lawn for treason.

                              מה מכילות החדשות?


                              • Re: Abuses Of Government By The Obama Administration

                                Originally posted by MattInFla View Post
                                FDR put innocent Americans in motherfucking concentration camps! Nothing else the motherfucker did matters. Not. One. Fucking. Thing.

                                If you feel FDR was divinely inspired, please tell me where the FUCK God said to put anyone in concentration camps.

                                You admire FDR for being against the rich while "millions starve", but you ignore the fact that innocent people starved and died in his concentration camps.

                                Fuck that evil motherfucker. Nothing Godly or divinely inspired - he was an agent of pure evil.
                                Originally posted by MattInFla View Post
                                The only American president to put people in concentration camps. The absolute worst president EVER, by far. A stone piece of shit, who should have been tried, convicted, and hung on the White House lawn for treason.
                                come on Matt... let it out... tell us how you really feel. Don't hold back...

                                מה מכילות החדשות?

                                Working...
                                X